There’s a thoughtful discussion of belief versus rationalism, as it applies to climate science, over at Climate Spectator.
Climate Spectator is a website “that will seek to cover not just the science and politics of climate change, but also the key business parameters: the massive flows of investment expected in coming years and decades, the changing business models, the new technology, and the creation of new markets and investment propositions.”
In his article Beyond belief Paul Gilding starts off:
It’s time for true confessions. I don’t believe in climate science.
That’s because I’m a rational person. Belief is important in my life and I apply the term to things involving faith. Faith is how we believe when there is no rational basis for a decision. Faith and belief often apply to matters of the spiritual realm. But they also apply to matters of a more worldly nature, where the capacity for faith and belief has framed many positive developments in humanity over history.
There are quite a few interesting points made by Paul and the people who commented on his post, so don’t delay, go read it now!